<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look! No twist!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/look-no-twist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/look-no-twist/</link>
	<description>A blog about sailing a 36 ft sailing boat with junk rig</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matti</title>
		<link>http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/look-no-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>matti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/02/look-no-twist/#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Well, I hope you can follow this explanation:

Before I made the change, the sheet started at the top sheeted batten, went down to the tripple deck block, up to a sheetlet that connected the next two battens, down to the deck block and up to a sheetlet that connected the lowest two battens and down to deck, with the sheeting end. This way every batten had one part of the sheet, so the upper battens were not pulled in as much as the lower ones due to different angles.

Now the sheet starts at a sheetlet connecting the two lower battens (so these get half a part each). It goes down to the deck block, up to a block connecting the two middle battens (so they get one part each). It goes down to the deck block and up to a block connected to the uppermost sheeted batten (so this batten gets two parts) and down to the deck block with the sheeted end. So this way the lowest battens get half the pull of the middle battens and these gets half the pull of the uppermost batten.

It seems acceptable this way, but we will tweak things later on.

/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I hope you can follow this explanation:</p>
<p>Before I made the change, the sheet started at the top sheeted batten, went down to the tripple deck block, up to a sheetlet that connected the next two battens, down to the deck block and up to a sheetlet that connected the lowest two battens and down to deck, with the sheeting end. This way every batten had one part of the sheet, so the upper battens were not pulled in as much as the lower ones due to different angles.</p>
<p>Now the sheet starts at a sheetlet connecting the two lower battens (so these get half a part each). It goes down to the deck block, up to a block connecting the two middle battens (so they get one part each). It goes down to the deck block and up to a block connected to the uppermost sheeted batten (so this batten gets two parts) and down to the deck block with the sheeted end. So this way the lowest battens get half the pull of the middle battens and these gets half the pull of the uppermost batten.</p>
<p>It seems acceptable this way, but we will tweak things later on.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/look-no-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 05:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/02/look-no-twist/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Hi Matti,

When you rereaved the sheet, what did you change it from and to exactly.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matti,</p>
<p>When you rereaved the sheet, what did you change it from and to exactly.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/look-no-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/02/look-no-twist/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Matti,

I just can&#039;t say enough how beautiful your boat is.  You and Celia really have something to be proud of.

/Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matti,</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t say enough how beautiful your boat is.  You and Celia really have something to be proud of.</p>
<p>/Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/look-no-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sylinnea.com/2007/09/02/look-no-twist/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Matti--
I&#039;m glad you had a great weekend sail.  Thanks also for this blog.  Every time you make an addition it inspires me more!  Great photos!!!

Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matti&#8211;<br />
I&#8217;m glad you had a great weekend sail.  Thanks also for this blog.  Every time you make an addition it inspires me more!  Great photos!!!</p>
<p>Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

